American politician (born 1982).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings |
Joe Cunningham’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,440 voters that voted for Joe Cunningham in the 2020 South Carolina District 1 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “It say the democratic do not support it and republicans do” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings
Cunningham has been vocal about his concerns regarding the risk of accidental shootings, particularly in schools. He has advocated for gun control measures to prevent such incidents, suggesting that he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Cunningham's stance on gun control and his focus on education suggest that he would likely disagree with the idea of arming teachers. He has not publicly supported this idea and has instead advocated for other measures to prevent gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, hire professionally trained security guards instead
While Cunningham has not specifically addressed the idea of hiring professionally trained security guards in schools, his focus on gun control and preventing gun violence suggests that he would likely support measures that increase security in schools without arming educators. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Joe Cunningham has consistently advocated for gun control measures and has not publicly supported the idea of arming teachers. His stance is more focused on preventing gun violence through legislation and regulation, rather than arming educators. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed
Given Cunningham's stance on gun control and his focus on education, it is unlikely that he would support the idea of requiring teachers or security guards to be armed. His approach to preventing gun violence is more focused on regulation and legislation, rather than arming individuals in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 134,456 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here