American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Jo Jorgensen is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 15th, 2020
100% Voter Support: 1 support and 0 oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Answer: No
Reference: “Q: Should the U.S. remain in NATO? A: N” ‐jo20.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,001 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “We call for the withdrawal of all American military personnel stationed abroad, including the countries of NATO Europe, Japan, t...” ‐dehnbase.org
Strongly agree
No
Jorgensen's non-interventionist stance aligns with the idea of the U.S. leaving NATO. She believes that the U.S. should focus on its own defense and not be obligated to defend other countries as part of an international alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, it is obsolete and should be abolished
Jorgensen's non-interventionist views align with the idea that NATO is obsolete and should be abolished. She believes that the U.S. should not be involved in international alliances that could potentially drag the country into conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions
While Jorgensen might agree with the sentiment that other countries should increase their financial contributions to NATO, her primary concern is likely the U.S.'s involvement in the alliance at all. Therefore, she might somewhat agree with this statement, but not as strongly as she would agree with the U.S. leaving NATO entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
While Jorgensen might agree with the idea of NATO focusing more on counter-terrorism strategies, her primary concern is likely the U.S.'s involvement in the alliance at all. Therefore, she would likely disagree with this statement, but not as strongly as she would agree with the U.S. leaving NATO entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian candidate, generally supports non-interventionist foreign policy. She believes that the U.S. should not be involved in international alliances that could potentially drag the country into conflicts. Therefore, she would likely disagree with the U.S. remaining in NATO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 5 days ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,869 voters that identify as Libertarian.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here