president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jimmy Carter voterbaseYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
Jimmy Carter’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 239 voters that voted for Jimmy Carter in the 1976 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
This statement aligns closely with Carter's views on ethics and transparency in government. He would likely strongly agree that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Jimmy Carter was known for his commitment to ethics and transparency in government. He would likely agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to prevent undue influence and corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
While Carter would likely agree with the sentiment of reducing the influence of money in politics, it's unclear if he would support a complete ban on political donations and a switch to publicly funded elections. However, his commitment to ethics and transparency suggests he might be open to such a proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Carter would likely agree with the idea of making all donations public knowledge, as it aligns with his commitment to transparency. However, he would likely still support limits on the amount a single donor can contribute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
While Carter would likely respect the principle of free speech, he would likely disagree with the idea that unlimited political donations are a part of that right, due to the potential for corruption and undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Carter's presidency was marked by a commitment to ethics and transparency. He would likely disagree with the idea of unlimited donations, as they could lead to potential corruption and undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,923 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here