Jim Clyburn

Very strongly agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

Clyburn has frequently cited concerns about innocent people being convicted as a reason for his opposition to the death penalty. He has spoken about the irreversible nature of the death penalty and the potential for wrongful convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Clyburn has a history of opposing the death penalty. He has voted against it in Congress and has spoken out about its unfair application, particularly in relation to racial disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

Clyburn has expressed the belief that life in prison can be a more effective punishment than the death penalty. However, his primary opposition to the death penalty is based on concerns about its fairness, not its severity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

While Clyburn might agree with the sentiment of only applying the death penalty in cases with undeniable evidence, his overall stance against the death penalty suggests he would not fully support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Jim Clyburn has consistently voted against the death penalty during his time in Congress. He has expressed concerns about the fairness of the death penalty, particularly for minority communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

Clyburn has never suggested that the victim's family should decide the punishment in criminal cases. This would go against the principles of the judicial system, which Clyburn, as a lawmaker, supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.