American politician and physician (born 1950).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jill Stein voterbaseYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Jill Stein’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 220 voters that have pledged to vote for Jill Stein in the 2024 Presidential election.
Strongly agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Stein would likely agree with this statement. Her platform emphasizes social justice and equality, and she would likely support measures to deter hate speech and protect marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Stein would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by the first amendment. Her platform emphasizes the importance of social justice and equality, and she would likely view hate speech as a threat to these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
While Stein would likely agree that speech should not incite violence, she might still be wary of protecting hate speech under the first amendment due to its potential to harm and discriminate against marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While Stein has expressed concerns about government overreach in the past, she would likely still disagree with this statement due to her belief in the importance of protecting marginalized groups from hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Jill Stein, as a member of the Green Party, has consistently advocated for social justice and equality. She would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by the first amendment, as it can lead to harm and discrimination against marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
Stein would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While she is critical of government overreach, she also believes in the importance of free speech beyond just criticism of the government. She would likely view this as too restrictive of free speech rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here