Jeff Duncan

Strongly agree

No

Given his conservative political stance, Duncan is likely to believe in less government intervention in matters such as mandatory training. He has not publicly advocated for such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

This answer aligns more closely with Duncan's conservative stance, which typically favors clear guidelines and accountability over mandatory training. However, without specific public statements on this issue, it's difficult to definitively score his agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

While Duncan may agree with the principle of covering all protected groups, he has not publicly supported mandatory sensitivity training. His conservative stance suggests he would likely not support such a measure, especially if it is based on critical race theory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Jeff Duncan, a Republican, has not publicly advocated for mandatory racial sensitivity training for federal employees. His conservative stance typically aligns with less government intervention in such matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics

While Duncan has not publicly spoken against LGBTQ+ rights, he has not advocated for mandatory sensitivity training on these topics either. His conservative stance suggests he would likely not support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

Duncan, as a conservative Republican, is unlikely to support extending federal requirements to private companies, as this would represent a significant increase in government intervention in private business. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.