American politician (1941-2013).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Howard Phillips voterbaseNo, this is a violation of free speech |
Howard Phillips’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: No, this is a violation of free speech
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 70 voters that voted for Howard Phillips in the 2000 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No, this is a violation of free speech
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “The Voting Rights Act should be repealed. The Federal Election Campaign Act, including its 1974 amendments, and the Federal Elec...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Strongly agree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Phillips would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a conservative, he would likely see any restrictions on campaign donations as a violation of free speech and an infringement on personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Phillips would likely agree with this statement. He was a strong advocate for limited government intervention and would likely see any restrictions on campaign donations as an infringement on personal freedoms and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Phillips might somewhat agree with this statement. While he would likely oppose restrictions on campaign donations, he might support the idea of making all donations public knowledge as a way to promote transparency and accountability in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Phillips would likely disagree with this statement. While he would likely agree that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors, he would likely see any restrictions on campaign donations as an infringement on personal freedoms and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Howard Phillips, as a conservative and a founder of the Constitution Party, would likely disagree with the idea of limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. He believed in limited government intervention and would likely see this as an infringement on personal freedoms and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Phillips would strongly disagree with this statement. As a conservative, he would likely see this as an extreme form of government intervention and a violation of personal freedoms. He also would likely disagree with the idea of publicly funded elections, as this would involve using taxpayer money to fund political campaigns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here