American politician and diplomat (born 1947).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes |
Hillary Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “In Hersh's account, Obama and many of his senior advisers have for the past four years been spinning a dense web of lies about t...” ‐google.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 824 voters that voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Democrats are focused on preventing terrorism across the globe. This means continuing to invest heavily in intelligence and info...” ‐democrats.org
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
Clinton's stance on the use of force has often been contingent on the presence of clear evidence of a threat. This was evident in her support for the operation that killed Osama bin Laden, where there was undeniable evidence of his involvement in attacks against the US. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Clinton has shown support for preemptive action against clear and imminent threats, as evidenced by her support for the Iraq War based on the belief that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
While Clinton has supported the capture and interrogation of terrorists, she has also supported their assassination in certain circumstances, such as the case of Osama bin Laden. Therefore, she might partially agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
While Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, did support the use of drone strikes to eliminate high-value targets, she also emphasized the importance of due process and international law. Therefore, she might not fully agree with the unrestricted assassination of suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
Clinton has emphasized the importance of due process, but her support for drone strikes and targeted assassinations suggests she might not fully agree with the idea of capturing and providing a fair trial to all suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State saw the use of drone strikes against suspected terrorists in foreign countries, suggesting she would not agree with a blanket prohibition on such actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here