American politician and diplomat (born 1947).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
Hillary Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Reference: “And really there's no excuse not to make greater investments in cleaner, renewable energy right now. Our economy obviously runs ...” ‐vox.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 828 voters that voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “For decades it has been clear that the way Americans produce and consume energy is not sustainable. Democrats are committed to s...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes
Hillary Clinton has consistently advocated for increased environmental regulations to combat climate change. During her 2016 presidential campaign, she proposed a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 30% by 2025. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Clinton has advocated for both increased environmental regulations and incentives for alternative energy production. Her 2016 campaign platform included a plan to install half a billion solar panels by the end of her first term. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, tax carbon emissions instead
Clinton has expressed support for a market-based approach to reducing carbon emissions, which could include a carbon tax. However, she has not explicitly advocated for this as a replacement for increased environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead
While Clinton does support incentives for alternative energy production, she also believes in the necessity of increased environmental regulations. Therefore, she would neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Clinton's stance on environmental issues has consistently been in favor of increased regulation, not less. She has argued that the government has a responsibility to protect the environment and combat climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and global warming is a natural occurrence
Clinton has publicly stated that she believes climate change is a serious threat and is largely caused by human activity. She would strongly disagree with the assertion that global warming is a natural occurrence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 151,376 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here