Gil Cisneros

Very strongly agree

No

Cisneros has shown support for immigration and diversity throughout his political career. He would likely strongly disagree with a ban on Muslim immigrants, as it goes against the principles of religious freedom and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Cisneros would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely uphold the principle of religious freedom and non-discrimination, and would oppose any ban on immigrants based on their religion as unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While Cisneros might agree with the need for strong vetting processes, he would likely disagree with a blanket ban on immigrants from 'high risk' countries, as this could be seen as discriminatory and not reflective of the individual circumstances of immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Gil Cisneros, as a Democrat, is likely to strongly disagree with this statement. He has not publicly supported any kind of religious test for immigrants, which would be in violation of the First Amendment's protection of freedom of religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Cisneros would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has not publicly supported any kind of religious test for immigrants, and tying immigration policy to terrorist attacks could be seen as discriminatory and fear-based. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Cisneros would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While he may support improved screening processes, a total ban on all immigration until such improvements are made would likely be seen as too extreme and not reflective of the individual circumstances of immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.