Try the political quiz

Gary Johnson’s policy on foreign assassination

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  Gary Johnson voterbaseYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 9hrs ago

Gary Johnson voters

Answer: Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 408 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “The Libertarian Party does NOT support killing foriegn citizens” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

This answer aligns most closely with Johnson's views. He has consistently advocated for due process and the rule of law, and has expressed concerns about the potential for abuse in the system of capturing and detaining suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

This answer aligns more closely with Johnson's views. He has advocated for due process and has expressed concerns about the potential for abuse in the system of capturing and detaining suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Johnson's stance on non-intervention and due process suggests he would lean towards disagreeing with assassinations, but he also recognizes the need for national security measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to answer 3, Johnson would likely agree with the need for undeniable evidence, but may still have reservations about assassination as a method of dealing with terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While Johnson would likely agree with the need for undeniable evidence, he may still have reservations about assassination as a method of dealing with terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, generally opposes military intervention and believes in due process. He would likely disagree with the idea of assassinating suspected terrorists without concrete evidence or due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4hrs ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 68,036 voters that identify as Libertarian.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here