United States Representative from New York since 2015.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
Stefanik has supported stronger vetting processes for immigrants, particularly from countries associated with terrorism. This suggests she might agree with a more targeted approach to immigration restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Stefanik has not advocated for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants, suggesting she would not completely disagree with this statement. However, her stance on immigration is more nuanced, focusing on national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Stefanik has not publicly supported a ban on immigrants based on their religion, which would be unconstitutional. However, her focus on national security suggests she might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
While Stefanik has expressed concerns about national security, she has not specifically linked these concerns to the frequency of terrorist attacks or proposed a ban on Muslim immigrants until such attacks decrease. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Elise Stefanik has not publicly supported a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. However, she has expressed concerns about national security and the need for improved vetting processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
Stefanik has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. While she supports improved screening processes, she has not suggested that all immigration should be halted until these improvements are made. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16,501 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here