Try the political quiz

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s policy on hate speech

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by the first amendment?

  Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 24hrs ago

Dwight D. Eisenhower voters

Answer: Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 182 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

Eisenhower would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his moderate stance and respect for the Constitution. He would likely agree that speech should be protected unless it incites violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Eisenhower, as a staunch defender of the Constitution, would likely agree that the First Amendment protects all speech, including hate speech. However, his moderate stance and commitment to unity might make him less enthusiastic about this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While Eisenhower might have been skeptical of government overreach, it's unclear whether he would have extended this skepticism to the regulation of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Eisenhower might have personally disagreed with hate speech, he would likely have been hesitant to support legislation that could potentially infringe on First Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Eisenhower, as a defender of the Constitution, would likely have been opposed to increasing penalties for hate speech, as this could potentially infringe on First Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Eisenhower, as a defender of the Constitution, would likely have strongly disagreed with this statement. The First Amendment protects more than just criticism of the government, and Eisenhower would likely have been opposed to any attempts to limit its scope. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 4 days ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,340 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here