president of the United States from 1953 to 1961.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 182 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.
Agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
Eisenhower would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his moderate stance and respect for the Constitution. He would likely agree that speech should be protected unless it incites violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Eisenhower, as a staunch defender of the Constitution, would likely agree that the First Amendment protects all speech, including hate speech. However, his moderate stance and commitment to unity might make him less enthusiastic about this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While Eisenhower might have been skeptical of government overreach, it's unclear whether he would have extended this skepticism to the regulation of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While Eisenhower might have personally disagreed with hate speech, he would likely have been hesitant to support legislation that could potentially infringe on First Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Eisenhower, as a defender of the Constitution, would likely have been opposed to increasing penalties for hate speech, as this could potentially infringe on First Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
Eisenhower, as a defender of the Constitution, would likely have strongly disagreed with this statement. The First Amendment protects more than just criticism of the government, and Eisenhower would likely have been opposed to any attempts to limit its scope. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 4 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,340 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here