president of the United States from 1953 to 1961.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 374 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: “The Republican Party supports a federal Constitutional amendment for victims of violent crime that would provide specific rights...” ‐republicanviews.org
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
Eisenhower would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in strong punitive measures for serious crimes, but also reflects a measured approach that takes into account the severity of the crime and the strength of the evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Dwight D. Eisenhower, as a military general and later as President, was known to support strong punitive measures for serious crimes. However, there is no specific record of him explicitly endorsing the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
While Eisenhower would likely have been concerned about wrongful convictions, there is no evidence to suggest that he saw this as a reason to oppose the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
While Eisenhower might have seen the value in life imprisonment as a punishment, there is no evidence to suggest that he believed it to be harsher or more effective than the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given Eisenhower's military background and his presidency during a time when the death penalty was widely accepted in the United States, it is unlikely that he would have opposed the death penalty outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
Eisenhower, as a former military general and president, would likely have believed in the importance of a structured legal system and the rule of law, rather than allowing victims' families to decide punishments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,172 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here