president of the United States from 1953 to 1961.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 343 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No, remove them from the U.S.
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Only legal immigrants, through tightly controlled borders The Republican Party supports reforming the immigration system to e...” ‐ontheissues.org
Strongly agree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Eisenhower's administration implemented 'Operation Wetback' in 1954, which aimed to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S., suggesting he would support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Eisenhower's administration implemented 'Operation Wetback' in 1954, which aimed to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S., suggesting he would agree with not giving amnesty to working illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
While Eisenhower's stance on fining companies that employ illegal immigrants is not explicitly documented, his administration's focus on removing illegal immigrants suggests he might support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but allow them to stay
While Eisenhower's stance on allowing illegal immigrants to stay is not explicitly documented, his implementation of 'Operation Wetback' suggests he would likely not support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Eisenhower's administration implemented 'Operation Wetback' in 1954, which aimed to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S., suggesting he would not support amnesty for working illegal immigrants, even if they pay taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Eisenhower's administration implemented 'Operation Wetback' in 1954, which aimed to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S., suggesting he would not support amnesty for working illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Eisenhower's administration implemented 'Operation Wetback' in 1954, which aimed to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S., suggesting he would not support a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,140 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
