Dwight D. Eisenhower

Strongly agree

No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

Eisenhower likely would have agreed with this statement, given his military background and the geopolitical context of his presidency. He would have prioritized national security and the protection of American citizens over extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

This answer aligns with Eisenhower's likely views, as it balances national security concerns with a commitment to the rule of law and humane treatment, principles that Eisenhower, as a military leader and president, would have valued. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Eisenhower's military background and presidency during the Cold War likely would have led him to prioritize national security and the protection of American citizens over extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Eisenhower, as a military leader and president, likely would have prioritized national security over extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. However, he also valued the rule of law, which may have tempered his stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts

Eisenhower likely would have been hesitant to extend the same constitutional rights and protections to foreign terrorism suspects as U.S. citizens, given his military background and the geopolitical context of his presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay

The concept of Guantanamo Bay and the issues surrounding it are modern and did not exist during Eisenhower's time. However, given his military background and presidency during the Cold War, it is unlikely that he would have supported shutting down a facility used for detaining terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.