American politician (born 1976).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Dusty Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 46 voters that voted for Dusty Johnson in the 2020 South Dakota District (at Large) US House of Representatives election.
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Johnson's political stance generally aligns with the idea of individual choice and freedom, which would likely extend to the choice to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Johnson has not publicly supported mandatory military service, suggesting he would likely agree with the statement that not every 18-year-old should be required to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Johnson has advocated for education and skill development, but he has not specifically linked these issues to military service. He might agree with the idea of focusing on these areas, but not necessarily within the context of mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While Johnson has not specifically addressed this issue, his general political stance suggests he would not support mandatory military service based on education or employment status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Dusty Johnson has not publicly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. As a Republican, he generally supports individual freedoms and choice, which would likely include the choice to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Johnson has not publicly supported the idea of mandatory military service as a response to criminal behavior. His stance on criminal justice reform suggests he would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Johnson has not publicly advocated for mandatory military service, let alone a two-year requirement. His political stance generally supports individual freedoms and choice, which would likely include the choice to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 19,558 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here