These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback
This answer aligns well with Kim's likely views. It combines a respect for gun owners' rights with a progressive approach to reducing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Kim likely supports measures to increase mental health and background checks, as these are common progressive positions on gun control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments
Kim has expressed support for demilitarizing the police, which suggests he might also support a mandatory buyback of assault weapons as part of a broader effort to reduce violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead
Kim might support a voluntary buyback program with financial incentives as a compromise solution. This approach aligns with his progressive values while also respecting the rights of gun owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
David Kim has not explicitly stated his stance on a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. However, as a progressive Democrat, he likely supports measures to reduce gun violence, which could include a buyback program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given his progressive stance, it is unlikely that Kim would oppose measures to reduce gun violence, such as a buyback program. However, without explicit statements, this is speculative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
Kim, as a progressive Democrat, likely disagrees with the argument that gun control measures violate the 2nd amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 31mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,092 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.