These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No
Kim's platform includes advocating for immigrant rights and opposing discriminatory policies. He would likely strongly agree with the statement that Muslim immigrants should not be banned from entering the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Kim would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his values of inclusivity, diversity, and respect for constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
While Kim might agree with the need for security measures, he would likely disagree with a blanket ban on immigrants from 'high risk' countries, as it could be seen as discriminatory and not in line with his values of inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
David Kim, as a progressive Democrat, strongly supports the rights of immigrants and refugees. He would likely strongly disagree with a ban on Muslim immigrants, as it goes against his values of inclusivity and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
Kim would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies a discriminatory policy based on religion and fear, rather than evidence-based policy making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
Kim would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies a complete halt to immigration, which goes against his advocacy for immigrant rights and his belief in the benefits of diversity and inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 21,950 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here