These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 663 voters that voted for David Kim in the 2020 California District 34 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “For decades it has been clear that the way Americans produce and consume energy is not sustainable. Democrats are committed to s...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes
David Kim has consistently advocated for increased environmental regulations to combat climate change. His campaign platform includes a commitment to the Green New Deal, which calls for strict environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Kim's platform includes both increased environmental regulations and incentives for alternative energy production. Therefore, he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, tax carbon emissions instead
Kim's platform does not specifically mention a carbon tax, but it does call for holding polluters accountable, which could include such a measure. Therefore, he would likely somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead
While Kim supports incentives for alternative energy production, he also believes in the necessity of increased environmental regulations. Therefore, he would neither agree nor disagree with this statement, as it suggests an either/or approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Kim's stance on environmental issues is clear in his support for the Green New Deal, which calls for increased environmental regulations. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with not increasing environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and global warming is a natural occurrence
Kim recognizes the scientific consensus that climate change is largely caused by human activities, not natural occurrences. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 149,878 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here