Dave Giles

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Giles, as a conservative Republican, would likely strongly agree with this statement. Conservatives often argue that reforming the Supreme Court in such ways would be unconstitutional and disrupt the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Giles would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a conservative, he would likely argue that the Supreme Court should remain impartial and not be influenced by political agendas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Giles, being a conservative Republican, would likely agree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court. This is in line with conservative values of preserving tradition and resisting radical changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Giles might see some merit in the idea of term limits for judges, as a conservative, he would likely still disagree with this reform. This is because it could potentially disrupt the stability and continuity of the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Dave Giles, as a conservative Republican, would likely disagree with expanding the Supreme Court or imposing term limits on judges. This is because such reforms are generally associated with progressive or liberal political agendas, which Giles does not align with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Giles would likely strongly disagree with expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court. This is a proposal often associated with progressive or liberal political agendas, which Giles does not align with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.