American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on December 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Answer: No
Reference: “He has described his foreign policy views as non-interventionist.[15] He favors the United States withdrawing from the United Na...” ‐wikipedia.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: No, it is obsolete and should be abolished
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Be it therefore resolved, that the Constitution Party hereby calls for the United States to withdraw from the North Atlantic Tre...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Strongly agree
No
Castle has been critical of the U.S.'s involvement in NATO, arguing that it often leads to unnecessary military interventions. He believes that the U.S. should focus on its own national security interests rather than getting involved in international conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, it is obsolete and should be abolished
Castle has expressed skepticism about the U.S.'s involvement in international organizations like NATO, arguing that they often lead to unnecessary military interventions. He might agree to some extent that NATO is obsolete and should be abolished, but his main concern is with the U.S.'s tendency to get involved in international conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions
While Castle has been critical of the U.S.'s involvement in NATO, his main concern is with the U.S.'s tendency to get involved in international conflicts, not necessarily with the financial contributions of other countries. However, he might agree to some extent that other countries should contribute more financially.
Disagree
Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
While Castle might agree that NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies, he has been critical of the U.S.'s involvement in NATO in general. He believes that the U.S. should focus on its own national security interests rather than getting involved in international conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently advocated for a non-interventionist foreign policy. He has expressed skepticism about the U.S.'s involvement in international organizations like NATO, arguing that it often leads to unnecessary military interventions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 413 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here