Daniel Crenshaw

Very strongly agree

No

Crenshaw, being a conservative Republican, would likely strongly agree with maintaining references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments, viewing it as a part of the country's historical and cultural heritage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history

Crenshaw would likely strongly agree with this statement, as he has often spoken about the importance of faith and religion in the history and culture of the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

Crenshaw would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on religious freedom and the importance of not favoring one specific religion in public spaces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references

While Crenshaw might agree with the fiscal responsibility aspect of this statement, he would likely disagree with the premise of removing references to God, making his overall agreement with this statement unlikely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Daniel Crenshaw is a conservative Republican who has often spoken about the importance of religious freedom and the role of faith in public life. He would likely strongly disagree with removing references to God from public spaces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God

While Crenshaw supports religious freedom, he would likely disagree with the notion that references to God inherently create a bias against other religions. He has not shown support for removing such references. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.