American politician and former Navy SEAL (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo |
Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “PVS:Oppose recreational marijuana. (Aug 2018” ‐ontheissues.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only for medical use
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 206 voters that voted for Daniel Crenshaw in the 2020 Texas District 2 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Republican views on marijuana tend to be against legalization, with the opposite being true for Democrats. The most recent gallu...” ‐republicanviews.org
Agree
Yes, but only for medical use
Crenshaw has shown some support for medical marijuana. In 2019, he voted in favor of an amendment that would prevent the Department of Justice from interfering with state laws regarding medical marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
While Crenshaw has not explicitly stated that he opposes the legalization of marijuana, his lack of support for full legalization suggests a level of disagreement with the concept. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders
While Crenshaw has not explicitly advocated for increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, his conservative stance on law and order issues suggests he may not be in favor of reducing penalties either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Daniel Crenshaw has not publicly supported the full legalization of marijuana. While he has shown some support for medical marijuana, he has not advocated for full recreational legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
Crenshaw has not publicly supported the full legalization, taxation, and regulation of marijuana. His conservative stance and lack of public support for full legalization suggest he would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses
Crenshaw has not shown support for the immediate release of those serving time solely for drug offenses. His conservative stance on law and order issues suggests he would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only for medical use
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 12,045 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
