These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Dana Cottrell’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 19 voters that voted for Dana Cottrell in the 2020 Florida District 11 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
This answer aligns most closely with Cottrell's likely views, as it emphasizes the importance of choice in military service. This is consistent with the Democratic Party's stance on personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Cottrell, being a Democrat, would likely support the idea that military service should be a choice, not a requirement. This aligns with the party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Cottrell might agree with the idea of focusing on education and skill development, but she would likely disagree with making military service mandatory, even with this focus. This is in line with the Democratic Party's emphasis on education and personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While Cottrell might agree with the idea of providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, she would likely disagree with making military service mandatory for this group, as it infringes on personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Dana Cottrell, as a Democratic candidate, is likely to support voluntary military service rather than mandatory. This is in line with the Democratic Party's general stance on personal freedoms and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Cottrell, as a Democrat, would likely disagree with the idea of mandatory military service as a form of punishment or rehabilitation for those with a criminal record. This is in line with the party's stance on criminal justice reform and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Cottrell would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it not only supports mandatory military service, but also extends the required service period. This goes against the Democratic Party's stance on personal freedoms and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,606 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here