These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas |
Dan Feehan’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 18 voters that voted for Dan Feehan in the 2020 Minnesota District 1 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Tired of waiting for the GOP, House Democrats announced their own immigration bill Wednesday that grants illegal immigrants a pa...” ‐washingtontimes.com
Strongly agree
No, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas
Feehan has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform, which often includes making it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas. This suggests he would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, just enforce the current border policy
Feehan's stance on comprehensive immigration reform suggests he would likely support enforcing the current border policy while also making necessary changes to address the root causes of migration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Feehan has not explicitly opposed increasing restrictions, but his focus on comprehensive immigration reform suggests he may not fully agree with maintaining the status quo without changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and allow border states to manage their own security policy
There is no clear evidence to suggest that Feehan supports allowing border states to manage their own security policy. His focus has been on federal level reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Dan Feehan has not explicitly advocated for increasing restrictions on the current border security policy. His focus has been more on comprehensive immigration reform and addressing the root causes of migration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and we should implement an open border policy
Feehan has not advocated for an open border policy. His stance on immigration reform suggests a balanced approach that includes both enforcement and pathways to legal status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 13hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,323 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here