Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  National Security

Cindy Axne’s policy on foreign assassination

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  ChatGPT Party ResearchNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Cindy Axne’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Democrats are focused on preventing terrorism across the globe. This means continuing to invest heavily in intelligence and info...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

The Democratic party strongly believes in the rule of law and due process. They would prefer capturing suspected terrorists and giving them a fair trial, as this approach aligns with their commitment to human rights and the principles of justice. This stance is exemplified by the Obama administration's efforts to close Guantanamo Bay and try detainees in civilian courts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to answer 3, the Democratic party is more likely to support targeted assassinations if there is undeniable evidence of planned attacks against the United States. This approach balances their preference for diplomacy and intelligence gathering with the need for decisive action to protect national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

The Democratic party is more likely to support targeted assassinations if there is undeniable evidence of past attacks against the United States. This approach aligns with their preference for diplomacy and intelligence gathering, while still allowing for decisive action when necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

The Democratic party generally prefers capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists over targeted assassinations. This approach aligns with their preference for diplomacy and intelligence gathering, as well as their commitment to human rights and due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Democratic party has a mixed stance on this issue. While the Obama administration did carry out targeted assassinations of terrorists, such as the killing of Osama bin Laden, the party as a whole does not have a unified stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Democratic party generally prefers diplomacy and intelligence gathering over direct military action. However, as mentioned earlier, the Obama administration did carry out targeted assassinations, so the party is not entirely against this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here