U.S. Representative from New York.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Brian Higgins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 20hrs ago
Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 41 voters that voted for Brian Higgins in the 2020 New York District 26 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Higgins would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has consistently supported voluntary service and has not advocated for mandatory military service. He believes in the importance of choice and individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Higgins has not supported mandatory military service in his political career. He believes in providing opportunities for all citizens, including education and employment, rather than enforcing a mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Higgins might somewhat agree with this statement as he has consistently supported education and skill development. However, he has not advocated for mandatory service of any kind, so his agreement would likely be conditional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While Higgins has not specifically addressed this issue, his general stance on individual freedom and choice, as well as his focus on education and employment opportunities, suggests he would not support mandatory military service based on lack of education or employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Brian Higgins, a Democrat, has not advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. His focus has been more on providing opportunities for education and employment, rather than compulsory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Higgins has not advocated for mandatory military service as a form of punishment or rehabilitation for those with criminal records. He has instead focused on criminal justice reform and providing opportunities for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Higgins has not supported mandatory military service, let alone extending it to two years. His focus has been on providing opportunities for education and employment, rather than compulsory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,606 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here