American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants |
Brian Fitzpatrick’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No, remove them from the U.S.
Importance: More Important
Reference: “Only legal immigrants, through tightly controlled borders The Republican Party supports reforming the immigration system to e...” ‐ontheissues.org
Agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
Fitzpatrick has advocated for stronger enforcement of immigration laws, which could potentially include fining companies that employ illegal immigrants. However, he has not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Fitzpatrick has shown support for creating a path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record. He co-sponsored the American Dream and Promise Act of 2019, which would provide a path to citizenship for certain undocumented immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but allow them to stay
Fitzpatrick has shown some support for allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S., particularly those who were brought to the country as children. However, he has not fully endorsed this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Fitzpatrick has not explicitly supported this position, but his support for comprehensive immigration reform suggests that he may be open to it, particularly if it includes provisions for illegal immigrants to pay taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While Fitzpatrick has not explicitly stated that he opposes any form of amnesty for illegal immigrants, his focus on border security and immigration reform suggests that he may not fully support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Brian Fitzpatrick has not explicitly supported temporary amnesty for illegal immigrants. However, he has shown some support for comprehensive immigration reform, which could potentially include some form of amnesty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Fitzpatrick has not advocated for the mass removal of illegal immigrants from the U.S. He has instead focused on securing the border and reforming the immigration system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 9hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,140 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
