These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Betsy Londrigan’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 743 voters that voted for Betsy Londrigan in the 2020 Illinois District 13 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “During the 2008 presidential campaign, it was Sen. John McCain, not then Sen. Barack Obama, who touted nuclear power. Obama, for...” ‐usnews.com
Strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Betsy Londrigan has consistently advocated for investment in cleaner, renewable energy alternatives. While she has not specifically mentioned wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy, her overall stance aligns with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
While Betsy Londrigan has not explicitly stated her position on nuclear energy, her emphasis on transitioning to renewable energy sources suggests she might support the temporary use of nuclear energy while increasing investment in cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
While Betsy Londrigan has not explicitly stated her opposition to nuclear energy, her emphasis on renewable energy sources suggests she may not fully support it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Betsy Londrigan has not explicitly stated her position on nuclear energy, including whether it should be subsidized or not. However, her focus on renewable energy suggests she may not fully support nuclear energy without public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Betsy Londrigan has not explicitly stated her position on nuclear energy. However, she has emphasized the importance of renewable energy sources, which suggests she may not fully support the use of nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Betsy Londrigan has not explicitly stated her position on nuclear energy, including whether it should be subsidized or not. However, her focus on renewable energy suggests she may not fully support nuclear energy with public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
Betsy Londrigan has not expressed any support for nationalizing industries, including the nuclear industry. Her focus on renewable energy and market-based solutions suggests she would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 147,614 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here