These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Barry M. Goldwater voterbaseYes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism |
Barry M. Goldwater’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 22hrs ago
Answer: Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 227 voters that voted for Barry M. Goldwater in the 1964 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism
Goldwater was a strong proponent of using all means necessary to combat threats to the United States. He was known for his hawkish views and his belief in the necessity of a strong military to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Barry Goldwater was a staunch advocate for a strong military and believed in aggressive action against perceived threats to the United States. While drones were not in use during his time, it is likely he would support their use for intelligence and combat purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists
While Goldwater would likely support the use of drones for intelligence gathering, his hawkish views suggest that he would also support their use for combat purposes. However, his belief in the rule of law may have led him to support some restrictions on their use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only with permission from the country in question
Goldwater believed in American sovereignty and the right to defend its interests. While he may have seen the value in obtaining permission from other countries, his primary concern would likely be the protection of American interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war
While Goldwater was a strong believer in the Constitution and the separation of powers, he also believed in the necessity of a strong executive branch to ensure national security. He may have seen the need for Congressional approval as a potential hindrance to swift action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given Goldwater's strong stance on military power and his belief in the necessity of preemptive action against threats, it is unlikely he would oppose the use of military technology to gain intelligence and neutralize threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Congressional Republicans remain staunchly committed to anti-terrorism drone strikes despite a January drone operation that acci...” ‐politico.com
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,022 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.