American politician and diplomat.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Andy Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Andy Kim has been a strong advocate for campaign finance reform, including public funding of elections. He has also called for a ban on corporate PAC money, suggesting he would likely support a ban on all political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Kim has been a vocal critic of the influence of wealthy donors in politics, suggesting he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Andy Kim has expressed concerns about the influence of money in politics. While he hasn't explicitly called for a limit on individual donations, his general stance suggests he would likely support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
While Kim has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his support for transparency in campaign finance suggests he would likely support making all donations public knowledge. However, his strong stance on campaign finance reform suggests he would prefer stricter limits on donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given his concerns about the influence of money in politics, it's unlikely that Kim would support unlimited donations from individual donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Kim's stance on campaign finance reform, including his support for public funding of elections and a ban on corporate PAC money, suggests he would strongly disagree with the idea that limiting donations is a violation of free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1hr ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,927 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here