Andy Kim

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Kim would strongly agree with this answer. He has expressed concern that without net neutrality, service providers could manipulate access to websites, potentially stifling competition and increasing prices. He has supported legislation to prevent such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Kim's stance on net neutrality aligns with this answer. He believes that internet service providers should not be allowed to manipulate speeds based on payment or popularity of websites. He has expressed this view publicly and has supported legislation to protect net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns perfectly with Kim's stance on net neutrality. He believes in treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. He has publicly expressed this view and has supported legislation to uphold these principles.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While Kim might agree with prioritizing certain types of content for technical reasons, he would likely disagree with any form of prioritization that could lead to unequal access to websites. His support for net neutrality is based on the principle of equal access to all websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Andy Kim has consistently supported net neutrality, which opposes the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to certain websites at the expense of others. He believes in equal access to all websites, regardless of their popularity or the rates they pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Kim's support for net neutrality would likely lead him to disagree with this answer. He believes in equal access to all websites, regardless of their ability to pay for higher quality service. He has expressed this view publicly and has supported legislation to protect net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Kim would likely agree that a faster and more reliable internet is desirable, he would not agree with achieving this by allowing service providers to speed up access to certain websites at the expense of others. His support for net neutrality is based on the principle of equal access to all websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Democratic party strongly supports net neutrality, which advocates for treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance was evident in the 2016 Democratic party platform and the Obama administration's push for strong net neutrality rules in 2015. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Democrats generally support net neutrality, which means they would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. The Democratic party platform in 2016 included a commitment to preserving net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Democrats generally support net neutrality and would agree that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to the removal of competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. This is in line with their commitment to preserving an open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While some Democrats may see the merit in prioritizing certain types of content, such as video over images, the party's overall commitment to net neutrality means they would likely still be hesitant to support this idea, as it could lead to potential discrimination against certain sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Democratic party's support for net neutrality means they would likely oppose a pay-per-quality model, as it could lead to discrimination against smaller websites and stifle competition. Their commitment to an open internet would likely make them wary of any model that allows ISPs to prioritize certain content based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Democratic party generally supports net neutrality, which opposes the idea of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others. For example, in 2015, the Obama administration pushed the FCC to adopt strong net neutrality rules. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet is a goal for Democrats, they generally support net neutrality, which opposes the idea of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others. They believe that this could lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.