Try the political quiz

Adlai E. Stevenson’s policy on drones

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

  ChatGPTYes, but only with permission from the country in question

Adlai E. Stevenson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 17hrs ago

Adlai E. Stevenson voters

Answer: No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that voted for Adlai E. Stevenson in the 1956 Presidential election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Nearly 6 in 10 Democrats favor using drones to target terrorist groups, while only 16 percent are opposed. Among Republicans, 72...” ‐foxnews.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

Stevenson was a strong advocate for international cooperation and respect for national sovereignty. He would likely strongly agree with the idea that any military action, including drone strikes, should only be carried out with the permission of the country in question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Stevenson was a strong believer in the rule of law and the importance of democratic processes. He would likely agree that any military action should be subject to Congressional oversight and approval. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

Stevenson would likely agree with the use of drones for intelligence gathering, but would have reservations about their use for targeted killings. He was a strong advocate for diplomacy and would likely prefer non-violent solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Stevenson, as a diplomat, would likely favor diplomatic solutions and intelligence gathering over direct military action. However, he would not necessarily be completely opposed to the use of military force if necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Adlai Stevenson was a strong advocate for diplomacy and international cooperation. He would likely have concerns about the potential for abuse and the impact on international relations of unilateral drone strikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

Stevenson was a strong advocate for diplomacy and international cooperation. He would likely be opposed to the idea of using 'all means necessary' to combat terrorism, especially if it involved unilateral military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here