American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Abigail Spanberger voterbaseYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Abigail Spanberger’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 19 voters that voted for Abigail Spanberger in the 2020 Virginia District 7 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Democrats know there is broad consensus to repair that system and strengthen our economy, and that the country urgently needs co...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Spanberger has been vocal about her support for creating a path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record. She believes in a comprehensive immigration reform that includes this provision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but allow them to stay
Spanberger has expressed support for allowing undocumented immigrants to stay in the U.S., particularly those who are contributing to their communities and have no criminal record. This is in line with her stance on comprehensive immigration reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Spanberger has shown support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who are contributing to their communities and paying taxes. Therefore, she would likely agree with this statement, although she has not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Abigail Spanberger has shown support for immigration reform and a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. However, she has not explicitly advocated for temporary amnesty, so her agreement may not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
While Spanberger has not explicitly advocated for fining companies that employ illegal immigrants, she has expressed the need for accountability in the immigration system. This could potentially extend to employers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given Spanberger's stance on immigration reform and her support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, it is unlikely that she would agree with a blanket 'no' to the question of amnesty for working illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Spanberger has consistently opposed policies that would result in mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. She believes in a more compassionate and comprehensive approach to immigration reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,203 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here