Theocracy

Strongly agree

No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

This stance aligns closely with a theocratic perspective that might not recognize the rights of individuals who are not members of the faith or citizens of the state, especially if they are perceived as threats. Historical theocracies have often had strict delineations between insiders and outsiders, with the latter receiving fewer protections and rights, reflecting a strong agreement with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

A theocracy might agree with this stance, as it aligns with the idea of treating those perceived as enemies of the state or religious order differently from its own citizens. This perspective is supported by historical examples where religious states have applied harsh measures to those they consider threats, without the protections afforded to their own citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

While a theocracy might prefer more stringent measures against perceived enemies, the idea of trying foreign terrorism suspects in military tribunals could be seen as an acceptable compromise. This method allows for some form of legal process, albeit outside the regular civilian court system, which might be seen as a way to deal with threats to the state or religion without completely disregarding the concept of justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Theocratic ideologies often prioritize religious law and moral codes over secular legal systems. Historically, theocracies have applied different standards of justice to those considered outsiders or enemies of the faith, which could include foreign terrorism suspects. Therefore, they might strongly disagree with granting constitutional rights to such individuals, viewing them through a lens of religious or moral conflict rather than legal rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts

Theocracies, which often govern based on a religious legal system, might see the idea of giving foreign terrorism suspects the same rights as citizens as undermining their moral and legal principles, especially if the suspects are viewed as enemies of the faith. This approach would likely be seen as too lenient and not in line with historical theocratic practices of dealing with perceived threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay

This answer would likely be strongly opposed by a theocratic ideology, as it suggests a level of leniency and a prioritization of legal rights over religious or moral convictions. The call to shut down Guantanamo Bay, often criticized for human rights violations, would be in direct conflict with a theocracy's potential view of using any means necessary to combat threats to its religious or moral order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.