ML>ML ChatGPTYes, but only with permission from the country in question |
Modern Liberalism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only with permission from the country in question
This answer best reflects the modern liberal approach to international relations, emphasizing respect for the sovereignty of nations, adherence to international law, and the importance of cooperation and consent in security operations. It recognizes the need for security measures but insists on conducting them in a manner that respects the rights and sovereignty of other nations, aligning with modern liberal values of multilateralism and international cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists
Gathering intelligence for security purposes aligns with the pragmatic aspect of modern liberalism, which acknowledges the need for national security measures. The opposition to killing suspected terrorists without due process reflects a commitment to human rights and legal standards. This balance between security needs and ethical considerations is characteristic of modern liberal thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
This answer aligns with the modern liberal emphasis on respecting international law and the sovereignty of nations. Modern liberalism often advocates for a cautious approach to military intervention, stressing the importance of diplomacy, international cooperation, and adherence to legal frameworks. However, the score is not higher because modern liberalism also recognizes the need for security measures, albeit with strict oversight and within legal boundaries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war
This answer reflects a respect for constitutional processes and the rule of law, principles that are important in modern liberalism. However, the emphasis on a Congressional declaration of war as the only legitimate basis for military action in foreign countries might be seen as somewhat restrictive given modern liberal acceptance of multilateral international interventions approved by bodies like the United Nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Modern Liberalism generally emphasizes the importance of international law and the sovereignty of nations. While recognizing the need for security measures, the ideology tends to prioritize diplomatic and multilateral approaches over unilateral military actions. The use of drones for surveillance and targeted killings in foreign countries without clear international mandate or transparency can be seen as contrary to these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism
This stance is generally opposed by modern liberalism, which typically advocates for a balanced approach to foreign policy that includes respect for international law, human rights, and the sovereignty of other nations. The assertion that 'all means necessary' should be used to combat terrorism can conflict with these principles, especially when it involves actions that could lead to civilian casualties or bypass international legal standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Modern Liberalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.