Under a provision of the Patriot Act the NSA is allowed to collect phone metadata — the numbers, time stamps, and duration of a call, but not its actual content. Opponents include civil liberties advocates and Senator Rand Paul who argue that the collection is unconstitutional since it is done without a warrant. Supporters of the collection argue that the collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists.
31% Yes |
69% No |
25% Yes |
53% No |
6% Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists |
14% No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
2% No, and abolish the NSA |
See how support for each position on “NSA Domestic Surveillance” has changed over time for 4.2m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “NSA Domestic Surveillance” has changed over time for 4.2m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@96WSPGH2yrs2Y
Defund the NSA and place restrictions on surveilance practices.
@8C85YSK4yrs4Y
Yes, if it truly is metadata and identifying information is only obtained via warrant and probable cause.
@8SRZSQK3yrs3Y
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity and abolish the NSA fbi Cia ntf open area 51
@9HFH9KC 5mos5MO
Yes , because important information can be tracked throughout phone calls, timestamps, call durations and more that may be useful to different situation
@9HCNSBJ6mos6MO
I feel they would serve a purpose when it came to illegal actions but i strongly disagree for then to just have that information from a civilian without a reason to.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “NSA Domestic Surveillance” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
