Should the military use weapons guided by artificial intelligence?

No, because it might not be as accurate and might attack friends but if it is like a auto lock on then maybe.

There should be an international treaty and task force to limit the use of A.I. in the military to prevent A.I. from having the ability to command weapons of mass destruction.

I am fine with AI being used by our military but, some things need to at least be backed up by a actual person doing something.

Absolutely not, at some point we will reach the singularity point and it will be too late. If we advance like this in war it will lead to more war.

I feel like using these weapons are ok until people who aren’t included in the situation are effected.

Current artificial intelligence technology is still in early development, using them now would risk accidental harms to civilian and infrastructure.

Yes, however the AI should be supervised and have to have it's actions approved by a human individual or group before it acts.

Yes and no because you don't kno0w what could happen ai is not always reliable but could be a helpful source.

I think that if we're going to fight there should not be any assistance from technological advancements however If we don't, other nations will in order to have a advantage over the United States

Yes, but only if used with things such as targeting systems in tandem with a human professional. No weapon should be controlled soley by an AI that chooses who, when, or where to open fire.

i think they should use a.i because there smarter however we shoud try to not give them to much power

they should work in tandem with the AI. using one over the other can cause human error or problems within the AI itself.

yes but only when artificial intelligence is at its peak and will be the least likely to malfunction and or make mistakes

the use of guided weaponry should be restricted and used less on and in civilian populated areas, however they should be used in the battlefield to restrict human casualties. weaponry should be guided by people and if they're guided by people at a distance if need be but using AI to guide weaponry should pose restrictions based on who its used on, where its used, if its safe to use, ect.

No, because current AI technology can be unpredictable and errors that could happen would be devastating.

Sure, but only if funded well and tested many times to make sure they work well and won't cause issues

No and NEVER, weapons should ALWAYS, ALWAYS be used and handled by Human Beings. Movies and past events have proven again and again that AI should NEVER EVER be used in anything really, but ESPECIALLY weapons.

Yes, but they shouldn't be able to think for themselves, they should just follow the command on where to go, but also know if they messed up, or if the missile is damaged, or any of the above.

No, because there is room for failure in the intention of said AI's programming along with an override.

NO! AI is not the solution to everything, and it is not a reliable source of information or solutions to a problem, if you are programming a missile to know where it is and where it isn't that's fine but if you want AI to practically run the Military and to an extent the government then you are setting us up for failure and our downfall.

for some things yes other things no. I think missiles and icbms yes but aviation vehicles like planes and helicopters no.

Yes, but this artificial intelligence should be an aid, not the end all, be all. There should still be human involvement in the use of weaponry.

Yes and no we have to manage who, what, and how these AI weapons are being controlled because it can be useful but again it can get out of control.

Yes, but only when the artificial intelligence is completely ready and foolproof, and it shouldn't be used for all weapons.

El crear una Nueva inteligencia para armas Seria completamente una locura por que estariamos enfatizando El crear Nueva Guerras aun que fueran usadas para defensa

Maybe, that's like fighting a war with technology not people--which I am on board with but at the same time wars are a people issue not a technology issue and there is no point in a war where you loose nothing but fake intelligence.

Yes, but only when the technology gets more accurate along with having a human along side it to make sure everything run smooth.

as long as it has been well tested and we know for a fact it wont turn on us and try and kill us like that one movie.

In some instances, they are beneficial; however, in the majority of cases, AI should not be used in the military.

Possibly for certain tasks but none that actually interfere with humans. AI could be used for defense but not for actual shooting.

yes, to an extent because if AI takes over, people will be out of a job and will not be able to fight for their country

So long as it's tested and proved that inaccuracies and miscalculation should be fine, then sure. Save human lives and keep our men in safety instead of out in the battlefield where they could be hurt.

Well this would help the safety of soldiers and put less people on the field but what if machines go wrong and cause more distructions and conflict and or when they are very updated they could turn against us yk.

I believe we should implement it under certain causes because the world is becoming more advanced every day.

The military gets a lot of money poured into it so I'm pretty sure that if they decided to let AI guide them they would be safe.

Only if the AI was tested multiples times to be secured and not hacked by a foreign enemy who wants to destroy America.

Yes, as long as there is always a human in the loop that makes the final judgement on the use of the weapon.

No defense only. Can we make a better shield with the use of aI?Yes, that would be preferable.Can we make a better gun With the use of aI?No that would not be preferable.

probably not man i feel like they would do some mean things to us if we pissed em off yk what im saying?

Yes, HOWEVER, the AI should be heavily trained and processed first before actually putting it on the field. PERFECT IT FIRST

I mean I'm not big on artificial intelligence at all, but if we absolutely need it then yes. Especially because the world is becoming more advanced everyday.

NO! AI is not the solution to everything and it is not a reliable source of information or solutions to a problem, if you are programming a missile to know where it is and where it isn't that's fine but if you want AI to practically run the Military and to an extent the government then you are setting us up for failure and our downfall.

I think this will eventually happen in the future but right now artificial intelligence is still new and should be further developed before use in the military.

Depends on the machinery or weapon. Heavy equipment like jets and tanks no, but kamikazi drones yes.

Not until we can be 100% confident that only intended targets will be harmed, even if that is not attainable anytime soon

no because then any other country or would be able to use this tech in wars all far in war you could make the weapons have facial recognition and make it so they have there own customisation so they dont pick up each others weapons and make it explode if not the operation of said weapon

Let the military do what they do. They know what they are doing. If they think it’s smart then yes, if not no.

No

Yes