Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestions1yr ago

Can you imagine a working world without the pressure of job security, and if so, what would it look like?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of

@6WBMZK3
#1 Informed Voter
@9VCKGVS
#2 Informed Voter
@8SRXJQG
#3 Informed Voter
@B4W2XXG
#4 Informed Voter

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

@9ZDKTZY
#1 Engaged Voter
@935LMPF
#2 Engaged Voter
@9ZC3F8Y
#3 Engaged Voter
@9VK759Q
#4 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

4 Replies

 @9JNYF6VDemocrat from Colorado  answered…1yr1Y

No, I Can't. The pressure of Job security is a very real and necessary thing. It keeps people working and things moving.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…1yr1Y

It’s also one of the greatest killers in the US, the last thing we need is more stress, since stress remains one of the biggest factors in premature deaths, right alongside poor regulation on food quality that leads to heart disease and cancer. If we’ve gotta be forced under the threat of poverty just to keep society running, then by much of that logic, incentives such as making not working a crime wouldn’t be immoral either.

 @9JNXXJWRepublicananswered…1yr1Y

Many people would have a job and depending on the character of the individual having job security could make them better or worse.

 @9JNXWJSDemocrat from New York  answered…1yr1Y

No but I feel like the world would be different and not in a good way.

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12mos12MO

“Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”

By Chuck Todd, NBC News:We are getting awfully close to the moment when it might be fair to say, “Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”We are now going from a presidential campaign that left the public disinterested and at times disgusted it to a campaign that I could see generating an electorate that might be as interested, if not more so, as in 2008 and 2020, two of the highest-turnout elections in the last 50 years.If the Democrats do end up with a new nominee — and it’s looking more likely by the hour that they will — that, too, is likely to suddenly trigger interest in what the new nominee has to say, which in turn could engage the electorate in a way that the pre-debate version of this campaign just didn’t.But before we get to this campaign reset, the Democrats have to figure out what their ticket looks like and, more important, how quickly they can get their ticket selected and certified by the party.As of this writing, my sources indicate to me that about the only folks who are still trying to rationalize Biden’s staying in this race all share the last name of Biden, with the possible exception of Biden’s longtime chief political strategist, Mike Donilon — who, as the gatekeeper of the data that makes it to the president's desk, is starting to get blame along with Biden and his family for Democrats’ being in this position.

▲  2015 replies