Yes

Children need to go to school to get an education. Higher education reduces crime and improves everyone else’s life.

No because the kids need to learn there subject.if they did not went to school they not going to know nothing in the real world.At least let them finish high school so they have experience if they encounter something they have to know.

Sometimes the breaks that students are given are not sufficient because the main reason students want time off is mental exhaustion, not celebration of something. Said exhaustion can happen for many reasons and at many times.

Education transformed the nation from an agricultural to a modernized first-world country, without mandating at least some basic level of education poverty rates will increase and the quality of life for countless Americans will plummet.

No. Children need to be in some sort of school. Of course there are exceptions for certain situations like mental or physical health. But otherwise truancy should be enforced. I have worked in public schools for almost ten years and truancy is a big problem.

The most compelling counter-argument against a "Yes" position on school truancy focuses on the potential negative impact on students' academic success, future opportunities, and overall well-being. Instead of prioritizing individual preferences or immediate gratification, the argument emphasizes the long-term benefits of consistent school attendance, including improved learning outcomes, social development, and increased chances of future success.
Elaboration:
Academic Performance:
Students who frequently miss school fall behind academically, leading to difficulty keeping up…  Read more with coursework and potentially hindering their ability to graduate.
Future Opportunities:
Regular school attendance is crucial for developing essential skills and knowledge that are necessary for pursuing higher education, vocational training, and future employment.
Social Development:
Truancy can lead to social isolation and disconnection from peers and the school community, hindering the development of crucial social skills and friendships.
Well-being:
Truancy can negatively impact a student's self-esteem, mental health, and overall well-being.
Addressing Underlying Issues:
Instead of simply accepting truancy, the counter-argument suggests that schools and parents should focus on identifying and addressing the underlying reasons for truancy, such as bullying, learning difficulties, or mental health concerns.
Importance of Parental Involvement:
Parents play a crucial role in promoting consistent school attendance and providing support to students who are struggling.
Focus on Solutions:
The counter-argument emphasizes finding effective solutions to address truancy, such as providing academic support, creating a positive school environment, and offering incentives for good attendance.

Studies have consistently shown that truancy is a strong predictor of future delinquency, crime, and unemployment, with the US Department of Justice estimating that 75% of high school dropouts will be arrested or incarcerated by age 35, highlighting the critical need for effective truancy prevention and intervention strategies to support students' academic success and long-term life outcomes. Furthermore, research has also demonstrated that addressing truancy through evidence-based approaches, such as mentoring, counseling, and family engagement, can lead to significant reductions in truancy rates, improved academic achievement, and enhanced social-emotional well-being, making a compelling case for prioritizing truancy prevention and support in our schools.

Kids go through things and so do the families so it shouldn't be a crime to miss a certain amount of school days.

School Truancy is a horrible crime because it takes away the learning that kids need to live their whole lives. Taking away kids' education is ridiculous, and the punishment for school truancy should be drastically increased.

Kids need as much education as possible. This can improve their efforts of receiving higher education.

Kids should have to graduate with a base knowledge, and if not required to go to school, then the literacy rate would fall in the United States, and the economic growth may slow as a result.

Attendance in school is vital to learning and the overall success of the individual and to the community. Even though the current school system is flawed in some ways, truancy is not the correct answer to that and we should instead attempt to fix what is flawed in our system.

kids are always late to class, complaining about being in clas, and teachers say were tired, yeah we wake up at 5 am and go to a building for 7 hours it might not sound like much to parents and teachers but it pretty exhaysting.

Education is the backbone of our society. If we were to eliminate the compulsion to go to school many teens would simply choose not to go to school and not recieve their much needed education. Not getting a high school diploma is one of the best indicators as for a future of poverty. Not attending school has a high correlation with failing grades and not receiving a diploma on time, or at all.

The government shouldn’t be able to force children to be forced Ik a certain way, it’s a form of brainwashing. Free education should be allowed on the internet, everything else should have to be paid for, not through taxes.

School truancy is more of a statement on parents partnering with the school to ensure the best outcome of the child. Parents should be help accountable to ensure their child makes it to school everyday, on time.

If students are required to be in school, to get an education, and become well rounded individuals that are intelligent and understand most subjects, why would we let them skip and turn into uneducated people that are less likely to become important or functioning members of society.

Even with the law, children are still truant. Take it away, and you open the flood gates to everyone.

Students can say they have rights and may chooses not to attend school. But school is important to prepare kids for life lessons that are valuable for growth.

Students, especially high school seniors, may not live with their parents or have a good relationship with them. If the parent is in charge of excusing the students absence, those with no contact or busy parents don't have a fair way to get marked excused. I think their should be more incentives for coming to school and school should be designed to have students wanting to come. But if something comes up or the student is dealing with at home issues, they shouldn't be punished for it.

If someone is ditching school, they'll see very soon the consequences, and if they still don't care about it, it should be their right to dictate their life. Also, even if a student doesn't officially attend "school", they could still be getting an education and learning new things in another way.

Most instances of abuse and neglect in a home or red flagged by a child’s truancy. If a child is not receiving proper care, very often schools are alerted to it through the child absences. Many children have been rescued from abusive situations because they were truant.