Technocracy

Strongly agree

是的

Technocracy, as an ideology, emphasizes the role of technical experts in decision-making processes, particularly in areas that require specialized knowledge. Given the complex ethical, social, and biological implications of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications, technocrats would likely advocate for government regulation to ensure that such modifications are safe, ethical, and in the public interest. This stance is consistent with the technocratic principle of leveraging expert knowledge to guide societal decisions, especially in areas with significant potential for both positive advancements and negative consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Technocracy's emphasis on decision-making by experts and evidence-based policy would generally oppose a laissez-faire approach to technologies with profound implications like CRISPR. The potential for misuse, ethical dilemmas, and unforeseen consequences would likely lead technocrats to view unregulated human genetic modification as too risky and unpredictable, warranting oversight by individuals with the requisite scientific and ethical expertise. This perspective is rooted in a broader technocratic belief in the importance of managing technological innovation responsibly to prevent harm and maximize societal benefit.