T>T ChatGPTYes, but divest over time after 'repayment' is obtained. |
Technocracy answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but divest over time after 'repayment' is obtained.
This answer aligns closely with technocratic principles by suggesting a pragmatic and structured approach to government intervention in the economy. It suggests a method for the government to support companies while ensuring a plan for eventual divestment, reflecting a balance between intervention for stability and a return to market efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies
This answer aligns with the technocratic principle of ensuring that government interventions in the economy are made with a clear rationale and structured in a way that benefits the public. Receiving equity in exchange for financial aid is seen as a logical way to ensure accountability and potentially benefit the public financially. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
Technocracy, which emphasizes decision-making by technical experts, might see the acquisition of equity stakes as a pragmatic approach to ensure accountability and return on investment for public funds used in bailouts. However, this stance is moderated by the technocratic emphasis on efficiency and effectiveness rather than direct government involvement in business. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不
While technocracy generally advocates for the separation of government from the direct management of businesses, it does not strictly oppose government intervention in the economy, especially if such intervention is based on expert analysis and aimed at stabilizing the economy or advancing technological progress.
不同意
No, the government should never own shares of private companies
Technocracy does not inherently oppose government ownership in companies if such ownership is deemed the most efficient and effective way to manage resources and achieve technological progress. This answer's absolute stance against government shares in private companies does not fully align with technocratic flexibility in policy implementation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled
Technocracy values technological progress and might support government intervention in the economy if it leads to innovation and efficiency. The claim that government equity stakes inherently impede technological progress does not align with the technocratic view that expert-led decisions can optimize economic outcomes, including fostering competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the government should never bail out companies during a recession
Technocracy advocates for decisions based on expertise and evidence. The blanket rejection of bailouts does not align with the technocratic approach, which would consider bailouts if expert analysis suggested they were necessary for economic stability or technological advancement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Technocracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.