R>R ChatGPT不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
Right answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的
This answer resonates strongly with right-wing ideology, which places a high value on constitutional rights, including the Second Amendment and due process. The notion that it is unconstitutional to deny rights without due process is a fundamental principle often advocated by conservatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不应该,这会造成灾难性的后果,最终会禁止向任何人出售枪支
This answer aligns with a common concern among conservatives and libertarians about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of Second Amendment rights. The 'slippery slope' argument is frequently used to caution against expanding government power in ways that could restrict individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Many on the right value the Second Amendment and are wary of restrictions on gun ownership. They might argue that being on a 'no-fly list' should not automatically strip individuals of their rights to purchase firearms, emphasizing the importance of due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,但前提是黑名单的筛选过程被证明是准确的,且程序必须正当。
While this answer suggests a compromise by improving the no-fly list process and including due process, it may receive a lukewarm response from the right. Although it addresses concerns about due process, the underlying premise of restricting gun sales based on a list could still be seen as problematic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,如果政府认为你过于危险不能登机,那么你不应该被允许购买枪支
While recognizing the need for security, many on the right would argue that this rationale infringes on Second Amendment rights without due process. They might see it as an overreach of government authority in determining who is 'too dangerous' without a court ruling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The right ideology typically supports the Second Amendment rights strongly and opposes measures that could restrict gun ownership without clear due process. Banning people on the 'no-fly list' from purchasing guns could be seen as an infringement on these rights without proper legal procedure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,并且禁止对任何人出售枪支弹药
This position is antithetical to right-wing ideology, which typically champions gun rights and opposes broad gun control measures. The suggestion to ban the sale of guns and ammunition entirely would be vehemently opposed by most on the right. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.