尝试政治测验

Pragmatism policy on drones

Topics

军方应该驾驶无人机飞跃外国领空获得情报并杀害可疑的恐怖分子吗?

P>P  ChatGPT是的,但是必须征求上述国家的同意

Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的,但是必须征求上述国家的同意

Seeking permission from the country in question aligns with a pragmatic approach to international relations and sovereignty, potentially reducing diplomatic fallout and enhancing the legitimacy of drone operations. This approach balances effectiveness with respect for international norms and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,美国需要不择手段地与恐怖主义斗争

This answer aligns with a pragmatic approach to national security, emphasizing the need to use effective means to combat terrorism. However, pragmatism would also consider the broader consequences of such actions, including international relations and legal constraints, tempering its agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

Pragmatism values practical outcomes and may support the use of drones for intelligence and counterterrorism if it leads to tangible security benefits. However, it would also weigh the potential for backlash, international law implications, and ethical concerns, leading to a cautious endorsement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人

This stance reflects a compromise that pragmatism might find appealing, balancing the need for intelligence gathering with concerns about the legality and morality of targeted killings. However, the practicality of such a distinction and its effectiveness in combating terrorism would be key considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

否,在国会没有宣战的情况下,军队无权这样去做

Pragmatism might appreciate the importance of legal frameworks and Congressional oversight but would not necessarily see a formal declaration of war as a prerequisite for all military actions, especially in the context of asymmetric warfare and terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

While pragmatism might recognize the ethical and legal issues associated with drone strikes, it would not categorically oppose their use if they are deemed effective and necessary for national security. The ideology's focus on practical outcomes means it would likely consider the context and potential benefits before dismissing the strategy outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.