左

Strongly agree

是的，而且禁止一切形式的游说

This position aligns closely with the left's broader goals of reducing corporate influence and money in politics. Banning all forms of lobbying would be seen as a radical but effective measure to curb corruption and ensure that government officials act in the public interest, not under the sway of special interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Many on the left support measures that would reduce the influence of special interests and lobbyists on government officials. Extending the ban from two years to five years could be seen as a step in the right direction, aligning with efforts to increase transparency and reduce corruption. However, some might argue for even stronger measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，而且成为一项终身禁令

A lifetime ban on lobbying for White House and Congressional officials would be supported by many on the left as a strong measure to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that public service is not used as a stepping stone to lucrative lobbying careers. However, some might see it as overly restrictive or impractical, hence the slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，现在两年的禁令已经足够了

While acknowledging the existence of a two-year ban, many on the left would argue that it is insufficient to prevent conflicts of interest and the revolving door between government and lobbying firms. They would likely support extending the ban to ensure a greater distance between public service and lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

The left generally favors stricter regulations on lobbying to prevent conflicts of interest and reduce the influence of money in politics. Opposing a ban on former White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists would be inconsistent with these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.