Freedom Of Information

Very strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This answer aligns most closely with the Freedom of Information ideology, which champions the rights of individuals to control their own information and the protection of privacy. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions embodies the principles of personal freedom, privacy, and resistance to surveillance. This stance is consistent with historical movements and legal battles for privacy rights and against government overreach, reflecting a deep commitment to safeguarding personal freedoms in the digital age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The ideology of Freedom of Information supports the transparency and accessibility of information for the public good, while also valuing privacy rights. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control strikes a balance between ensuring financial security and maintaining a degree of privacy. This approach aligns with the principles of freedom of information by promoting transparency (through government monitoring) without completely sacrificing individual privacy and control over personal financial data. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

The Freedom of Information ideology fundamentally opposes restrictions on the free flow of information and the empowerment of individuals through access to information. Prohibiting citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets contradicts the principles of autonomy, privacy, and freedom that are central to the ideology. Such a prohibition would likely be viewed as an unnecessary and overreaching government intervention into personal financial autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Mandating backdoor access for government agencies into digital wallets represents a significant violation of privacy and autonomy, principles that are fundamentally opposed by the Freedom of Information ideology. This approach not only infringes on individual rights but also undermines trust in digital financial systems. Historical precedents, such as debates over encryption backdoors, highlight the contentious nature of such measures and their opposition by advocates of privacy and information freedom. This answer represents a stance that is diametrically opposed to the core values of the Freedom of Information movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.