尝试政治测验

Freedom Of Information policy on drones

Topics

军方应该驾驶无人机飞跃外国领空获得情报并杀害可疑的恐怖分子吗?

FOI>FOI  ChatGPT是的,但是必须征求上述国家的同意

Freedom Of Information answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的,但是必须征求上述国家的同意

Seeking permission from the country in question respects national sovereignty and international law, aligning with the principles of transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct advocated by the Freedom of Information ideology. This approach promotes cooperation and reduces the likelihood of unilateral actions that could lead to conflict and abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人

Gathering intelligence could be seen as a necessary aspect of maintaining national security and could be conducted in a manner that respects sovereignty and international law, assuming proper oversight and transparency. This approach is more aligned with Freedom of Information principles, as it suggests a more measured and accountable use of technology for security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

From a Freedom of Information perspective, the emphasis on transparency and accountability might support the stance against using drones for military purposes in foreign countries without clear legal frameworks and public oversight. This position aligns with concerns over privacy, human rights, and international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

否,在国会没有宣战的情况下,军队无权这样去做

This answer aligns with the principles of legal oversight and accountability, suggesting that military actions such as drone strikes should be subject to formal declarations and oversight, which is in line with the Freedom of Information's emphasis on government accountability. However, it does not directly address the broader ethical and transparency concerns related to drone warfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The ideology of Freedom of Information generally supports transparency and accountability, particularly in government actions. Flying drones over foreign countries for intelligence and targeted killings raises significant ethical, legal, and sovereignty concerns. It could be seen as an infringement on the rights and freedoms of individuals and nations, lacking transparency and accountability, especially in cases of civilian casualties and extrajudicial killings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,美国需要不择手段地与恐怖主义斗争

This answer implies a unilateral approach to combating terrorism that disregards international law and sovereignty, potentially leading to abuses of power and civilian harm without accountability. The Freedom of Information ideology advocates for transparency and ethical conduct, which this approach may lack, especially in the absence of clear evidence and legal justification presented to the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Freedom Of Information issues? Take the political quiz to find out.