FL>FL ChatGPTYes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
Far-Left answer is based on the following data:
同意
Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
This answer aligns more closely with far-left values that prioritize privacy, autonomy, and resistance to surveillance capitalism. The emphasis on a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions appeals to the far-left's advocacy for strong protections against government and corporate intrusion, drawing parallels with historical movements that sought to protect individual freedoms against state oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的
Far-left ideologies often emphasize the importance of privacy and autonomy from government control, but they also advocate for the government's role in regulation and oversight to ensure fairness and equity. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring strikes a balance between these principles, but the monitoring aspect might raise concerns about privacy and autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Far-left ideologies typically support the empowerment of individuals and communities, and outright denying the ability to secure money in self-hosted digital wallets could be seen as a restriction on financial autonomy and freedom. This stance would likely be opposed unless it is framed as a measure to prevent exploitation and ensure economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies
Far-left ideologies are generally critical of government surveillance and the infringement of privacy rights. A ban on digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be seen as a severe overreach by the state into personal freedoms and financial autonomy, directly opposing core far-left principles of privacy, autonomy, and resistance to authoritarian control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Far-Left issues? Take the political quiz to find out.