Elderly Interests

Very strongly agree

No, our government needs experienced leaders

This answer perfectly encapsulates the Elderly Interests ideology's belief in the importance of experience in leadership, suggesting that older politicians should be valued for their knowledge and history of service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

This answer aligns closely with the Elderly Interests ideology, which would oppose measures that could be seen as discriminatory against older individuals, advocating for their continued participation in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

This ideology would likely argue against age-based restrictions, emphasizing the value of experience and wisdom that older politicians bring to governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

The Elderly Interests ideology might support this view, recognizing the potential for abuse in mental competency testing and preferring to protect the rights of older politicians to serve based on their experience and electoral support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, I would prefer term limits instead

While term limits do not directly address age, this solution might be seen as a more equitable way to refresh political leadership without discriminating based on age, thus receiving mild support from the Elderly Interests perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

While this answer proposes equality in testing across all ages, the Elderly Interests ideology might still be cautious about the implications of mental competency tests, fearing they could be used to unfairly target or exclude older politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Elderly Interests ideology might view a required mental competency test for politicians over 75 as ageist, potentially marginalizing experienced leaders based on age rather than capability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

This answer directly opposes the Elderly Interests ideology by suggesting an age cap on political service, which would exclude many older individuals from participating in governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.